Students at Manchester University have removed Rudyard Kipling's poem "If" (one of the greatest and most popular poems in the English language) from a wall in a Students' Union (SU) building. They object to it not because they disagree with the sentiments of the poem. It's Kipling they have a problem with. They regard him as a racist and that he “stands for the opposite of liberation, empowerment, and human rights”. According to the Telegraph, Sara Khan, the liberation and access officer (what?) at Manchester’s SU, blamed a “failure to consult students” during the renovation of the SU building for the Kipling poem being painted on the wall in the first place. “We, as an exec team, believe that Kipling stands for the opposite of liberation, empowerment, and human rights - the things that we, as an SU, stand for,” she said. Continue reading
The following is a guest post by Roger Helmer. Roger was a MEP representing the East Midlands from 1999-2017, and is a former chairman of The Freedom Association. We’re accustomed to hear Michel Barnier (and others in Brussels) insist that the UK can’t “cherry-pick” its trade agreement with the EU. It’s a term they seem to apply to anything short of total acceptance of the acquis communautaire, since almost by definition any agreement will address some issues and not others. Yet Monsieur Barnier is the biggest cherry-picker of them all. He has said he’d be prepared to offer the UK a Free Trade Deal (FTA) on goods, but not on services. Well of course he would. The EU has a massive trade surplus in goods with the UK -- £95 billion in 2017, according to the Commons Library briefing. So free trade in goods is massively to Brussels’ advantage. On the other hand the UK has a much smaller surplus in services with the EU -- £28 billion. So an FTA in services would benefit Britain – but far less than the EU’s benefit on goods. Any sensible British negotiator might have said “OK – we’ll talk about an FTA covering goods and services, even though that’s a huge concession on our part, given Brussels’ overall trade surplus with the UK. But you can’t cherry-pick goods, which work in your favour, and exclude services, which work in our favour”. Continue reading
"It's not too late to save Brexit". Watch Boris's tour de force in the House of Commons this afternoon.
Responding to the judgement in the High Court this morning, Andrew Allison, Head of Campaigns for The Freedom Association, said: "I am delighted that Sir Cliff Richard has won his case in the High Court this morning. The BBC should have accepted that it had acted wrongly by invading his privacy in this most disgraceful way. But instead, the BBC is considering appealing against today's judgement describing it as a 'dramatic shift against press freedom'. Continue reading
This is the response from Jacob Rees-Mogg MP, Chairman of the European Research Group (ERG): STARTS“This is the greatest vassalage since King John paid homage to Phillip II at Le Goulet in 1200. "This White paper has not needed age to turn yellow. There are very few signs of the Prime Minister’s famous red lines. It is a pale imitation of the paper prepared by David Davis, a bad deal for Britain. It is not be something I would vote for nor is it what the British people voted for. Continue reading