Britain's railways should be fully privatised

In an excellent article in today's Telegraph, Tony Lodge from the Centre for Policy Studies, makes the case for more competition on the railways. Or as I put it, full privatisation, rather than John Major's botched privatisation that we have at the moment. Full privatisation means competition, rather than the 'take it or leave it' option most passengers have at the moment. 

Retford_railway_station_MMB_03_180101.jpgTony has long argued for more open access providers, such as Hull Trains and Grand Central. I completely agree with him and have written numerous articles on the subject. When I travel to London on the East Coast Main Line (ECML), I use Hull Trains. There are seven direct services a day from Hull to London, and seven from London to Hull. Grand Central also runs on the ECML, so this means that if you want to get a train from, say, Doncaster to London, you have the choice of three different operators: Virgin East Coast, Hull Trains, and Grand Central. Everything from the service you receive, the comfort of the seats, the lower cost of fares, to the punctuality of the trains, is better on the ECML thanks to competition. 

If Jeremy Corbyn ever becomes Prime Minister expect a return to British Rail. If we really want to secure the future of our railways, fully privatise it before it's too late. 

Photo Credit: mattbuck

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Jordan Lee
    commented 2019-11-19 17:14:30 +0000
    Also although agree with capitalism I support Jeremy Corbyn and anybody that doesn’t like him can get lost also the only train operator that is nearly perfect after the rubbish iets is LONDON NORTH EASTERN RAILWAY.
  • Jordan Lee
    commented 2019-11-19 17:11:47 +0000
    hull trains and any train operator that runs class 180’s instead of class 43 HST’S is shit.
  • Jordan Lee
    commented 2019-11-19 17:08:14 +0000
    No the railways should be 50 percent privatised and 50 percent NATIONALISED.